home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: thunder.ocis.temple.edu!akim
- From: akim@thunder.ocis.temple.edu (Andrew Kim)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: Borland C/C++ vs MS Visual C/C++ ?
- Date: 5 Feb 1996 21:56:40 GMT
- Organization: Temple University, Academic Computer Services
- Message-ID: <4f5ueo$nq5@cronkite.ocis.temple.edu>
- References: <4et6i3$18eo@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4etj4u$7s1@sam.inforamp.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: thunder.ocis.temple.edu
- NNTP-Posting-User: akim
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Randy Charles Morin (rmorin@inforamp.net) wrote:
- : In article <4et6i3$18eo@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>,
- : pzmig@ibm.net (Phillip Zmigrodski) wrote:
- : >Does anybody have a feeling for which is the better compiler:
- : >Borland C/C++ vs MS Visual C/C++ ?
- : >
- : >Thanks in advance.
-
- : MS Visual C/C++
- : I get $40/hr and jobs coming out of my ears with MS-V.
- : I get $35/hr and 6 months unwanted vacation with BC.
-
- : Agrivar
-